Advanced Markets

When the first generation of a high-net-worth family can’t qualify for life insurance, the usual estate-tax funding playbook stalls. Here’s the structure advisors use to keep the plan moving anyway.

The problem when the first generation is uninsurable

Estate tax planning for wealthy families usually follows two steps: reduce the anticipated tax bill with every workable strategy, then insure against what’s left with life insurance on the first-generation client, typically a grandparent. That plan breaks down when the grandparent turns out to be a medical decline and can’t get coverage at any price.

Shifting the insurance to the next generation

Most tax and legal advisors point to the same fallback: insure the second generation instead, so there’s liquidity to cover estate tax when the second generation’s wealth eventually passes to the third. The structure that makes this work is often called generational split-dollar.

How the loan structure works

The first generation lends the premium dollars to the owner of the policies on the second generation, usually an irrevocable trust whose beneficiaries are generations two and three. The note is repayable only when the second-generation insureds die, often decades away. That timing matters for two reasons: the loan doesn’t require using any of the first generation’s lifetime gift-tax exemption to cover premiums, and when the note’s value later lands in the first generation’s estate, it can qualify for a meaningful valuation discount since repayment is so far out.

What the Levine case confirmed

Generational split-dollar drew scrutiny for years after some unfavorable rulings. That changed with the Tax Court’s decision in Levine v. Commissioner, which upheld a $2,300,000 valuation on a $6,500,000 note, saving the estate over $1,500,000 in estate taxes, and gave attorneys a workable blueprint for drafting these arrangements.

How to use this with clients

This is a fit for families where the first generation is uninsurable and there’s still a meaningful anticipated estate tax bill at the second generation’s death. Underwriting the second generation is more involved, since it requires showing the carrier a credible path to the anticipated inheritance, but it’s often the only way to keep the estate-tax funding plan alive once the first generation can’t qualify.

If you have a client whose estate plan depends on insurance the first generation can no longer qualify for, that’s a case we can help you work through.

Frequently asked questions

Reviewed by Tim Fuller on 2026-09-23

Tim Fuller

President, SRS Inc.

Tim leads SRS Inc., a full-service IMO (Independent Marketing Organization) and BGA (Brokerage General Agency) connecting independent financial professionals with life, annuity, disability income, and long-term care solutions from 60+ carrier partners — with the impaired-risk and complex-case expertise to place business other IMOs and BGAs turn away.

Connect on LinkedIn →

Every well-run household has someone who keeps it running — and that person often earns no paycheck. Because the role isn’t paid, its replacement cost is easy to overlook. Here’s how to size and place coverage on the household’s domestic key person.

The household’s unpaid key person

Think of the head butler in a great English manor: every detail of the household ran through him, and when things went well, it was because he made them go well. The modern homemaker or stay-at-home parent plays a similar role — and, like the butler, is rarely recognized or paid in proportion to the value delivered.

Because the job has no salary, families seldom think about what it would cost to hire out childcare, transportation, meals, household management and everything else if that person died. That gap is a real and often easy-to-address planning need.

How to determine a coverage amount

Sizing coverage on a non-working spouse is typically a two-step process:

1. Insure the breadwinner properly. Carriers use fairly standard income-multiple guidelines; our article on income multiples in life underwriting walks through them.
2. Match the homemaker to that amount where possible. Many carriers will allow coverage on the non-earning spouse equal to, or a percentage of, the working spouse’s in-force coverage.

Economical level term with guaranteed premiums until the children are grown is often the right fit, which makes this one of the simpler sales you’ll have.

When the family doesn’t fit the template

Carrier choice matters most when the facts are outside the norm. In one case, a retired grandmother had taken on full-time care of her two grandchildren, and the household was supported by her other daughter, who was single, working and adequately insured.

Rather than allow coverage on the grandmother equal to the working daughter’s, the first carrier proposed only a multiple of her Social Security income — an offer under $50,000. Finding a carrier that recognizes the economic value of a caregiver in a non-traditional household can change that outcome dramatically.

A springboard to broader planning

Raising coverage on the domestic key person addresses a vital need, and it naturally opens conversations about the breadwinner’s coverage, disability income, college funding and beneficiary planning. When a case doesn’t fit a carrier’s standard guidelines, contact us — our team knows which carriers are more flexible for non-earning insureds.

Frequently asked questions

Reviewed by Tim Fuller on 2026-09-25

Tim Fuller

President, SRS Inc.

Tim leads SRS Inc., a full-service IMO (Independent Marketing Organization) and BGA (Brokerage General Agency), connecting independent financial professionals with life, annuity, disability income, and long-term care solutions from 60+ carrier partners.

Connect on LinkedIn →